‘Here are the romantics, whose chief burden is to destroy ordinary tolerant life, to destroy philistinism, to destroy common sense, to destroy the peaceful evocations of men, to raise everybody to some passionate level of self expressive experience, of such kind as perhaps only divinities, in other works of literature were supposed to manifest. This is the ostensible purpose of romanticism, whether among the Germans or in Byron or among the French, or whoever it may be; and yet, as a result of driving wedges into the notion of the classical ideal of the single answer to all questions, of the rationalisability of everything, of the answerability of all questions, of the whole jigsaw puzzle conception of life, they have given prominence to and laid emphasis upon the incompatibility of ideals. But if these ideals are incompatible, then human beings sooner or later realise that they must make to, they must make compromises, because if they seek to destroy others, others will seek to destroy them; and so, as a result of this passionate, fanatical, half mad doctrine, we arrive at an appreciation of the necessity of tolerating others, the necessity of preserving an imperfect equilibrium in human affairs, the impossibility of driving human beings so far into the pen which we have created for them, or into the single solution which possesses us, that they will ultimately revolt against us, or at any rate be crushed by it.

155 Accepting the final report and recommendations from the . The task force completed its work and issued its final report that is being introduced at this week’s Common Council meeting. The report will be referred to the Board of Park Commissioners for their Wednesday meeting before returning to the Common Council.

I know the United Church would prefer it if I wasn’t gossiping, especially about the church itself, but they are.Full disclosure, I grew up going to the United Church. Was baptized there. Went every Sunday and enjoyed the sermons of Rev. Google’s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to Users based on their visit to our Site and other sites on the Internet. DART uses “non personally identifiable information” and does NOT track personal information about you, such as your name, email address, physical address, etc. Has the discretion to update this privacy policy at any time.

‘I leave you with my revelation embrace the petty tyrants (I will) I claim my value here and now,’ she wrote. ‘May we use it all for uplifting, learning and growth. This is more than a look for me this is the process letting go. The post below is written for the upcoming Spanish translation of The Book of Why, which was announced today. It expresses my firm belief that the current data fitting direction taken by Science is temporary (read my lips!), that the future of Science lies in causal data interpretation and that we should prepare ourselves for the backlash swing.Much has been said about how ill prepared our health care system was in coping with catastrophic outbreaks like COVID 19. Yet viewed from the corner of my expertise, the ill preparedness can also be seen as a failure of information technology to keep track of and interpret the outpour of data that have arrived from multiple and conflicting sources, corrupted by noise and omission, some by sloppy collection and some by deliberate misreporting, AI could and should have equipped society with intelligent data fusion technology, to interpret such conflicting pieces of information and reason its way out of the confusion.Speaking from the perspective of causal inference research, I have been part of a team that has developed a complete theoretical underpinning for such problems; a development that is briefly described in Chapter 10 of The Book of Why.